Abstract Although there seems to
be a consensus among mathematics educators that judgments of the
quality of research should be based on a set of widely accepted
criteria applied in a constructive, non-dogmatic way, such
criteria are not yet available. Instead, because a common
vocabulary has not been used, various sets of criteria for
research quality have been proposed, and no one has attempted to
uncover those latent issues concerning quality whose realization
and a step-by-step utilization would be particularly beneficial
for novice researchers. This paper proposes the grouping of
criteria for the quality of research in mathematics education into
three basic comprehensive standards. The appropriateness of the
three standards is established through an analysis of a
representative sample of proposed sets of criteria. The standards
are examined in terms of suitable indicators and then applied to
the realization of a study searching for the dimension of
mathematics attitude that mainly influences mathematics
achievement. Although the standards may appear to apply only to
the evaluation of research reports, their use may also increase
the quality of the design and management of research activities
for both quantitative and qualitative research studies.
|