Abstract Studies of the
publishing practices in mathematics education have situated sets
of journals in tiers of quality. These reports document the
rankings and prestige of only a subset of the wealth of journals
available for publishing in mathematics education. We posit that
there is value, quality, and purpose to be found in journals that
present studies that are of value on a regional level, and that
the studies are extremely important to the field. This is
particularly important for journals published in languages other
than English, and the studies referenced above are almost entirely
English-language journals. In this paper we seek to demonstrate
that we as a field of researchers cannot discount the value and
role of these regional and small-country journals. Using a case
study of one small European country, we quantitatively present the
areas of strength and weakness in the publishing practices in
mathematics education journals that are unlikely to be seen beyond
the region of their publication. We conclude with recommendations
to publish in areas where research is lacking as well as
recommendations to the community at large to recognize the value
of such outlets.
|