Abstract This study aims to
analyze and document the types of knowledge that university
students exhibit to deal with fundamental issues that they had
studied in a first ordinary differential equation course.
Questions that helped us structure the research included: How do
students interpret and deal with the concept of solution to an
Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE)? To which extent do students
use mathematical concepts they have previously studied to answer
basic questions related to ODEs? And, to what extent do the
students' answers privilege the use of certain type of
representation to explore and examine issues related to ODEs?
Results indicate that, in general, students choose one of two
methods to verify whether a function represents a solution to a
given ODE: a substitution method or by solving directly the given
equation. It was observed that they do not rely on concepts
associated with the meaning of derivative to make sense and deal
with situations that involve basic ODEs' ideas; rather, they tend
to reduce their knowledge of ODEs to the search for an algorithm
(analytical approach) to solve particular groups of equations. In
addition, there is evidence that students do not use graphic
representations to explore meanings and mathematical relations and
they experience difficulties to move back and forth from one type
of representation to another.
|